Moral Judgment About Harm: Emotion, Reasoning, and Their Interplay
When facing dilemmas that pit preventing harm against maximising welfare, two competing systems vie for control: emotion-driven harm aversion, and reasoning-based cost-benefit analysis. A decade of research mapped how each operates, when they conflict, and what makes one prevail.
Patil et al. (2014). Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas. Social Neuroscience, 9(1), 94–107.
Patil et al. (2017). The behavioral and neural basis of empathic blame. Scientific Reports, 7:5200. - Reasoning ability predicts utilitarian choices across eight independent studies — independently of how intensely someone dislikes causing harm
- Psychopathy's link to utilitarian judgement traces to reduced aversion to performing harmful acts specifically, not reduced concern for victims
- Emotional immersion in virtual reality closes the gap between what people say they would do and what they actually do, showing that behaviour and stated principles can dissociate
- Better reasoners more readily forgive accidental harms, redirecting attention from emotional reactions toward the perpetrator's innocent intent
Relevant Publications (4)
- Patil, I.* , Zucchelli, M.M.*, Kool, W., Campbell, S., Fornasier, F., Calò, M., Silani, G., Cikara, M., & Cushman, F.A.. (2021). Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(2), 443–460.
- Patil, I., & Tremolière, B.. (2021). Reasoning supports forgiving accidental harms . Scientific Reports, 11:14418.
- Patil, I.. (2015). Trait psychopathy and utilitarian moral judgment: The mediating role of action aversion . Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 349–366.
- Patil, I., Cogoni, C., Zangrando, N., Chittaro, L., & Silani, G.. (2014). Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas . Social Neuroscience, 9(1), 94–107.
Visit the Publications page for PDFs, supplementary materials, and data.
Patil et al. (2014). Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas. Social Neuroscience, 9(1), 94–107.
Patil et al. (2017). The behavioral and neural basis of empathic blame. Scientific Reports, 7:5200.